Invité Posté(e) le 3 avril 2012 Eh oui, dans le cadre de mon job, il m'arrive de voir passer des actus qui concernent VW...Celle-ci est toute récente, et semble indiquer que VW, propriétaire de la marque "GTI", n'a pas suffisamment défendu cette marque dans le passé. Aujourd'hui, c'est devenu un terme générique, et VW vient de se faire annoncer qu'il ne peut plus la protéger, sauf si cela crée une véritable confusion pour le consommateur... Or, Suzuki, en l'espèce, a déposé une marque "Swift GTI", qui ne peut induire le consommateur en erreur.Il s'avère donc que si VW avait empêché toute utilisation des lettres GTI depuis 1976, cette marque resterait aujourd'hui à son seul usage. Une leçon à retenir pour VW et pour tout propriétaire d'une marque distinctive.(Sorry, c'est en anglais...)In 1976 Volkswagen introduced the GOLF GTI. A sporty car which acquired an enormous popularity. Volkswagen registered the letter combination GTI as a trademark in several countries. In 2003 Suzuki applied for a mark SWIFT GTi. Volkswagen pointed out that she was the owner of the mark GTI and opposed the application in the name of Suzuki.Last week the European Court of Justice declared that the use of SWIFT GTi does not infringe the trademark rights from Volkswagen. The risk of confusion between the mark from Volkswagen and the mark from Suzuki is not likely according tot the European Court of Justice.It is relevant to note that some other car manufacturers as Peugeot, Nissan, Citroën and Toyota also used GTI on a range of cars produced by them. The mark GTI is not very distinctive according to the European Court of Justice. The fact that Suzuki is using the combination GTI in combination with the fancy name SWIFT counters the similarity between the respective marks. Consumers would not assume that all vehicles, parts and accessories come from the same manufacturer simply on the basis of the use of the letters GTI.A lesson that can be learned from this ruling of the European Court of Justice is that the owner of a trademark registration has to defend its trademark because if he does not do that, he may loose its rights to the mark. It starts with the choice of a distinctive trademark. Then a trademark owner has to defend its trademark against the use of similar signs by third parties to avoid that the trademark becomes a generic term. Partager ce message Lien à poster Partager sur d’autres sites